翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills
・ Secretary of State for International Development
・ Secretary of State for Justice
・ Secretary of State for Latin America and Africa (Canada)
・ Secretary of State for Northern Ireland
・ Secretary of State for Protestant Affairs
・ Secretary of State for Scotland
・ Secretary of State for Social Services
・ Secretary of State for the Colonies
・ Secretary of State for the Environment
・ Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
・ Secretary of State for the Northern Department
・ Secretary of State for the Provinces
・ Secretary of State for the Southern Department
・ Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater
・ Secretary of State for Transport
・ Secretary of State for Wales
・ Secretary of State for Wales and Northern Ireland
・ Secretary of State for War
・ Secretary of State for War (France)
・ Secretary of State for War and the Colonies
・ Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
・ Secretary of State of Alabama
・ Secretary of State of Arizona
・ Secretary of State of Arkansas
・ Secretary of State of Azerbaijan
・ Secretary of State of California
・ Secretary of State of Colorado
・ Secretary of State of Delaware


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater : ウィキペディア英語版
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater

''Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater'' () IRLR 928 ((EAT )) is a UK labour law case, concerning the effects of a business transfer on an employee's rights at work. If the company goes into voluntary liquidation, and the business is sold before the final disposal of assets, then TUPER 2006 regulation 8 does not apply.
==Facts==
An insolvent company was going into voluntary liquidation, with the help of Deloitte accountants, on 25 July 2006. The employees were made redundant on 26 July 2006. On 27 July 2006 the business was sold as a going concern and the employees were engaged again. In August, there was a creditors meeting and Deloitte accountants were appointed as liquidators. The employees wanted arrears of pay.
The Tribunal held that, under TUPER 2006 regulation 7, ‘at the time of the transfer’ the transferor was subject to ‘insolvency proceedings’. So, the it held that TUPER 2006 regulation 4 was excluded and the National Insurance fund was liable for debts under ERA 1996 section 182. The Secretary of State appealed arguing that though there were insolvency proceedings, they were not existing ‘at the time of the relevant transfer’.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Slater」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.